|
|
Zoë MoonI’ve had little contact with Zoë in her five or so
years of life. Her parents are in the military, and Zoë was born in It was a typical snapshot, taken in the shade of a tree and bearing a bluish cast. The girl was not even looking at the camera, instead being absorbed in something in her hand, a bug not being out of the question. Her other hand clutches the handle of a colorful basket in which rides a toy rabbit. No doubt her mother didn’t have in mind that her daughter might be sitting in the dirt under a tree when she dressed her that morning, but that is the way of mothers and young daughters. The photograph is a couple of years old, and as I said, one of many. I happened to be sorting through computer files of photographs, struggling to keep them organized, when this one popped out at me, asking for my attention. My organizing task was set aside. (Distraction is as often a gift as it is a nuisance when one reaches my age.) It had apparently been cropped from a larger photo, and lacked much detail. An ordinary snapshot, a souvenir of a bright spring day that eventually will find itself in a grandmother’s album when the subject has grown up and produced children herself. As I worked with the photograph, it took on a life of its own. It wasn’t the right shape, being cut off at the top, and the girl is dimly lighted. To attempt to print it at a size that would reveal much about what she is doing would result in a grainy, blotchy image with indistinct detail. Still, it tugged at my sleeve. “Notice me,” it pleaded. Years ago, when I worked (and played) in a traditional darkroom, it was nearly always with black and white images. Color photography was beyond my technical and financial abilities. That didn’t lessen the appeal of the process for me, however. I spent many hours of many years, watching images appear magically in trays of chemicals that smelled of acetic acid. My fingers were stained brown from silver salts. The aesthetic results of all those hours were not memorable. The psychological results, however, have stayed with me all my life. Thirty years ago I learned, and used in a magazine article I was writing, a word—ubiquitous—in referring to what we called in those days “the microcomputer” to distinguish it from the room-filling monsters used by large companies and the military to do their momentous number crunching. To most people, they were curious little machines assembled like tinker toys by introverted young people fascinated with the almost unimaginable potential of ones and zeros. What was also unimaginable to me then was the true ubiquity that personal computers have come to possess. And the limitless range of their applications. I was delighted that I could record my thoughts and produce pages of words, infinitely variable, forever changeable. Only in the past few years has the ability of the personal computer to manipulate images become real to me. I have replaced my dimly-lit and smelly darkroom with a colorful computer screen. And I’ve discovered that a simple snapshot, translated into ones and zeros that allow all that infinite variety and malleability, can become something more than a dim, memory jogging shadow pasted in a grandmother’s album. It was no longer a flaw in the photograph that the detail was hidden in grain—it could be converted into a misty blur, as indistinct as the memory it represented, as full of potential as imagination itself. The bluish cast could be changed with a keystroke to a warm and human atmosphere, sunny as the girl herself. The snapshot becomes an icon, rimmed in pink like the flowers and bows on the little girl’s dress. The mythical sculptor who falls in love with a stone he has shaped into a likeness of his imagination has become a dottering old man, playing with ones and zeros, fascinated by the blurry but rich imaginings of childhood memory, responding to the plea, “Notice me.”
Donald Skiff, December 28, 2003 Comment
on this essay? Send me an e-mail, please.
|